Why Plato Became the Harshest Critic of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey

3 days ago 20
Plato and Aristotle The Greek Philosophers 'Hiding' successful  Raphael's "School of Athens" Plato and Aristotle walking and disputing. Detail from Raphael’s The School of Athens (1509–1511). Credit: Jorge Valenzuela/ Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0,

In the Republic, Plato scrutinizes Homer’s epics with a severity that often goes unrecognized.

He argued that galore celebrated epic stories represent gods and heroes successful ways that are unsuitable for shaping the motivation imaginativeness of younger generations. Therefore, poets indispensable beryllium corrected to align their works with information and virtue, arsenic envisioned successful his perfect city.

Since aboriginal upbringing begins with stories alternatively than demonstrated knowledge, the archetypal tales a kid hears indispensable beryllium cautiously crafted and morally coherent. Plato adjacent allows for politically utile fictions but lone nether strict control.

This program, helium suggests, could yet pb to the rejection of imitative poetry—as we spot successful Book X—and to the usage of a civic “noble lie.” The proposals rise cardinal questions astir education, truth, paternalism, and however our societies navigate these enduring issues.

Statue of Odysseus lasting  with a cloak and unit   successful  Vathy, Ithaca.Odysseus, the protagonist of 1 of Homer’s epics. Credit: Jean Housen, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0

Homer connected proceedings successful Plato’s Republic

In Books II–III, Socrates challenges poets successful general, but Homer is his superior target. Here, Plato (through Socrates) accuses Homer of portraying the gods arsenic quarrelsome, changeable, oregon deceitful, arguing that specified depictions are mendacious and morally corrupting for young audiences.

Socrates proposes excluding stories successful which gods laughter uproariously, weep, deceive, oregon perpetrate crimes, insisting that divinity should ever beryllium depicted arsenic unchanging and wholly bully successful immoderate acquisition communicative admitted into the perfect city.

Plato’s constituent is yet 1 of motivation psychology: the stories a metropolis sings and stages signifier the quality of its youth. Harmful narratives foster mediocre judgments astir piety, courage, and self-control earlier crushed matures, influencing the children who volition go the citizens of his perfect society.

Plato and the archetypal stories

According to Plato, acquisition begins with euphony and story earlier mathematics and dialectic, based connected the knowing that young radical sorb patterns earlier they tin measure reasons.

Plato argued that this penetration makes the enactment of stories taught to younker a important origin successful quality formation. For this reason, helium maintained, the founders of an perfect nine indispensable oversee the literate corpus, admitting lone exemplary models and excluding sensational characters presented arsenic admirable oregon divine successful nurseries and schools.

This modular fundamentally reshapes the relation of poets and performers, transforming them from unregulated entertainers into civic co‑educators nether the law, liable for conveying images that foster truthfulness and ethical development.

Plato's Republic.Plato’s Republic. Credit: quinn.anya, Flickr, CC BY 2.0

Plato, poetry, and power

In Book III, the notorious noble prevarication combines a communicative astir autochthony with the story of metals to foster fraternal loyalty among citizens and stabilize conscionable relation duty by quality alternatively than birth.

Here, Socrates reluctantly—but deliberately—proposes a single, expansive deception that the city’s leaders would disseminate for the community’s benefit, explicitly acknowledging a constricted support for rulers to employment mythological narratives successful authorities erstwhile specified stories service societal cohesion and motivation excellence.

Later, successful Book X, Plato revisits poesy from a metaphysical and intelligence perspective, arguing that mimetic creation (mimesis successful Greek) is acold from information and inflames the little parts of the soul, thereby undermining rational order. He truthful calls for a wide exclusion of imitative poesy from the perfect city, with the sole exceptions being hymns to the gods and praise of virtuous men. This ban, helium insists, should stay unless poets tin convincingly show genuine benefits for quality and cognition.

The treatment resonates with modern debates connected children’s entree to societal media, curricular choices, and the contented they brushwood successful media. Modern institutions likewise separate betwixt age-appropriate worldly and unfiltered spectacle, implicitly affirming that stories tin amended oregon miseducate earlier captious literacy develops. Yet the cardinal question—then and now—remains: wherever is the enactment betwixt liable curation and paternalistic power that risks totalitarianism? In the Republic, immoderate allowance for poesy is explicitly conditional connected a persuasive defense.

It is just to reason that Plato’s rigorous critique of Homer is portion of a broader acquisition model helium envisioned for his perfect society, successful which the aesthetic autonomy of the authorities is intertwined with motivation truth. This information is governed by the elite and designed to signifier virtue, peculiarly successful the youngest citizens whose souls are astir impressionable.

Related: Why Did Plato Want to Ban Poets From His Ideal Republic?

Read Entire Article

© HellaZ.EU.News 2025. All rights are reserved

-