Top Prosecutor in Greece Closes Door on New Wiretapping Probe

The determination reinforces long-standing concerns that the afloat scope of the wiretapping operation—and the individuality of those who held “decisive authority” implicit it—will stay unresolved.  Credit: AMNA

The Greek Supreme Court Prosecutor, Konstantinos Tzavellas, has officially ruled against reopening the probe into the country’s high-profile wiretapping scandal. In a determination issued connected April 27, 2026, the Prosecutor concluded that the grounds presented by the Athens Misdemeanor Court does not represent “new facts” capable to overturn erstwhile judicial findings.

This improvement efficaciously halts efforts to grow the investigation, which a little tribunal had pushed pursuing the February 2026 convictions of 4 individuals associated with distributing the Predator spyware. While the little tribunal had suggested a deeper probe into imaginable espionage and the engagement of further almighty figures, the Supreme Court Prosecutor maintained that these theories stay speculative.

Regarding the allegations of espionage against elder officials—including authorities ministers and the Chief of the Hellenic National Defence General Staff—the Prosecutor argued that determination is nary verified impervious that authorities secrets were successfully accessed oregon stolen.

He characterized the presumption that delicate information was compromised simply due to the fact that these officials were targeted arsenic “hypothetical” and “uncertain.” Furthermore, helium reiterated that investigators person been incapable to place the existent idiosyncratic of the prepaid paper linked to the malicious links sent to governmental figures, specified arsenic PASOK person Nikos Androulakis.

Supreme Court determination limits further probe into authorities failures

The Prosecutor’s directive emphasizes the rule of “legal certainty,” informing that the judicial strategy cannot beryllium trapped successful an “endless cycle” of identical investigations without important caller evidence. He noted that the caller proceedings proceedings failed to supply the indispensable breakthroughs to warrant reopening a lawsuit record that had already been archived.

For the Greek government, this ruling serves arsenic a important organization endorsement of the archetypal investigations led by Deputy Prosecutor Achilleas Zisis.

However, for critics and absorption figures, the determination reinforces long-standing concerns that the afloat scope of the wiretapping operation—and the individuality of those who held “decisive authority” implicit it—will stay unresolved.

The lawsuit has present reached a procedural deadlock, efficaciously signaling that nary further state-led inquiries are presently planned, contempt ongoing nationalist statement and governmental unit regarding the scandal’s lingering unanswered questions.

Related: Who Really Governs Greece? The Wiretapping Scandal Shaking the Country