The Macron couple will present scientific evidence in court to prove that Brigitte is a woman

Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, program to contiguous photographic and technological grounds to a US court to beryllium that Mrs Macron is simply a woman, the couple’s lawyer revealed a fewer hours agone portion speaking connected a BBC podcast.

Tom Clare said the French president and First Lady volition nutrient the documents arsenic portion of a defamation suit they person filed against blimpish influencer Canda Owens, who has been publically promoting her content that Brigitte Macron was calved a man. As the British web recalls, Ms Owens’ lawyers person filed a question to disregard the lawsuit.

Speaking connected the Fame Under Fire podcast, the couple’s lawyer successful the lawsuit said Brigitte Macron finds the allegations successful question “incredibly disturbing” and that what is being said is “distracting” to the French president. “I’m not suggesting that this lawsuit has distracted him. But arsenic would beryllium the lawsuit with anyone trying to harvester vocation and household life, erstwhile your household is nether attack, it affects you. He’s not invulnerable to these situations due to the fact that he’s the president of a country.”

He said determination would beryllium “expert grounds that volition beryllium technological successful nature.” Although helium declined to uncover further details astir it, helium said the brace were prepared to beryllium beyond tenable uncertainty that the allegations are mendacious “both mostly and specifically.”

“It’s highly disturbing to deliberation that you person to spell done thing similar this to contiguous grounds of this benignant It is simply a process to which she would person to acquisition successful a precise nationalist way, but she is consenting to bash so. She is determined to bash immoderate it takes to reconstruct the truth. If the suffering and embarrassment she feels done this study tin pb to the information being restored and an extremity to this case, she is 100% acceptable to transportation that burden.”

Asked if the Macrons mean to nutrient photographs of Brigitte erstwhile she was large and snapshots of her raising her children, Mr. Clare said that this worldly exists and volition beryllium presented to the court, wherever determination are rules for these kinds of proceedings.

Ms Owens, a erstwhile commentator for the blimpish US media outlet Daily Wire who has millions of followers connected societal media, has repeatedly claimed publically that Brigitte Macron was calved a man. In March 2024, she claimed she would “stake her nonrecreational reputation” connected that belief.

The claims astir Brigitte Macron’s sex surfaced successful fringe online groups respective years earlier, astir notably via a YouTube video successful 2021 by French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natasha Ray.

The Macrons initially won a libel suit against the 2 women successful 2024, but that determination was overturned connected entreaty successful 2025, connected state of look grounds alternatively than connected the ground of the information of the allegation. The Macrons appealed the decision. In July, the Macrons filed a suit against Ms Owens successful the US, complaining that she “ignored each credible grounds that negated her allegation successful bid to beforehand known conspiracy theories and sycophants.”

In libel cases against nationalist figures tried successful the US, plaintiffs request to beryllium “actual malice” – that is, that the suspect knowingly dispersed mendacious accusation oregon acted with a disregard for the truth.

Last August, Emanuel Macron explained to French mag Paris Match wherefore helium and his woman chose to spell the ineligible route, stressing that they felt they had to support their honour against the nonsense being bandied about. “This is simply a pistillate who knew afloat good that she had mendacious accusation and did truthful with the volition of causing harm, serving an ideology,” helium said of Owens.

Ms. Owens’ lawyers filed a question to disregard the lawsuit, arguing that it should not person been filed successful Delaware because, they say, it does not impact her businesses, which are registered with the state. They assertion that requiring her to support herself successful Delaware would origin “significant fiscal and applicable hardship” to the influencer.