In Greece, the struggle astir the European Prosecutor’s Office is escalating. Sofia Vultepsi from “New Democracy” sharply attacked Laura Kovesi, accusing her of “dictatorial methods” and questioning the very attack to investigations.
New Democracy attacks the European authoritative Laura Kovesi and characterizes her arsenic a idiosyncratic “dictatorial views”.
“She comes from a state that has nary tradition of separation of powers.”– said the lawman ND Sofia Vultepsi.
MP ND launched an unprecedented onslaught against the European Prosecutor, with statements straight related to with its origin.
At the aforesaid time, she stated that Ms. Kovesi “comes from a state that has nary tradition of separation of powers”transparently hinting that she is still influenced by legacy of the Ceausescu regime.
Watch the video:
ND attacks Kovesi: Vultepsi connected “dictatorial methods” pic.twitter.com/qs5znxtHbo
— Athens News (@russianathens) April 22, 2026
“She comes from a country, I repeat, that does not person a tradition of separation of powers, which is why she tried to execute an hold extracurricular the judicial council, arsenic happened precocious successful her homeland, done herself.
I would similar the European Union to name to this archetypal prosecutor’s bureau a authoritative from France who knows Montesquieu and knows that you cannot interfere and accidental that you person violated your law, which talks astir the judicial council.
If you take something from Ceausescu… It’s still too caller successful Romania, it takes a batch of clip to retrieve from it.”said astatine archetypal Sofia Vultepsi.
She then continued her onslaught connected Laura Kovesi, comparing the substance OPECPEPE and a dossier connected 13 ND deputies with a lawsuit Novartis.
“I accidental 1 thing: travel the money, fto them travel the trail of money.
Here we person data, arsenic successful the lawsuit of Novartis: alternatively of judging those who made the prescriptions and prescriptions, they looked for Pikramenos.
If she brings maine someone from PASOK who conscionable made 1 telephone and some husbandman received 190.87 euros, I will say: “guys, calm down, due to the fact that everything is not so simple.”
She hung Weber connected a nail, but helium was acquitted, she tormented him for two years, there was nary evidence. She quarreled with Ireland.
[…] I don’t want justness for Ceausescu successful Greece.
When the Ceausescu authorities fell, helium had 500,000 securitate, and adjacent children denounced their parents successful their ain homes.
These things don’t permission you. These 500,000 disappeared somewhere, hid somewhere.”,” Vultepsi concluded her speech.
Editorial comment
Scandal surrounding the deputy’s statements Sofia Vultepsi to the caput of the European Prosecutor’s Office Laura Kovesi shows however profoundly politicized justice issues and power within the European Union.
On the 1 hand, the presumption of the typical “New Democracy” (ΝΔ) is based connected the thesis astir abuse of power by the European Prosecutor’s Office. Vultepsi really questions the legitimacy of the involution of a supranational bodyfocusing connected Kovesi’s origins and the humanities acquisition of her country, hinting astatine the deficiency of traditions of separation of powers.
On the different side, logic of the European Prosecutor’s Office initially assumes independence from nationalist governmental systems and the close to analyse imaginable violations, particularly if we are talking astir European funds and cross-border schemes.
This is where the cardinal contradiction arises: for European institutions the precedence is power and investigationwhile for nationalist governmental elites – protecting governmental stability and one’s ain positions.
The third constituent of view, which is actively discussed successful the nationalist space, comes down to a much rigid mentation of what is happening. According to her, such attacks connected Kovesi whitethorn beryllium associated not so overmuch with issues of jurisdiction, but with an effort discrediting the probe mechanics itself against the backdrop of cases involving representatives of the ruling party.
In this discourse argument astir “a state without antiauthoritarian traditions” looks similar a governmental manipulation to displacement the statement from facts to personality. At the aforesaid time, such rhetoric inevitably raises the other questions: Greece has a analyzable caller governmental history, including play of subject juntawhich makes appeals to “purity of antiauthoritarian traditions” acold from clear-cut.
As a result, we person not conscionable a quality astir a specific investigation, but a broader conflict: between nationalist argumentation and supranational control, betwixt the extortion of powerfulness and the demands of transparency.
Diplomatic connection aside, the question becomes simple: this is astir protecting organization sovereignty—or trying to trim unit successful matters that whitethorn beryllium politically sensitive.
Greek (GR) · 
English (US) ·